Posted by: towmasters | September 15, 2008

The 30-Day Wonder

Well, they finally went and did it, and we always had “faith” in them that they would. The Coast Guard published their Final Rule for “Training and Service Requirements for Merchant Marine Officers” that serve on towing vessels last Thursday in the Federal Register, and it’s quite a statement. Sea-time earned on actual towing vessels is, to the Coast Guard and the supporters of this rule-change, not terribly important if you want to “lateral” over into the towing industry from other sectors of the Merchant Marine. It’s so unimportant to them, in fact, that now the holders of licenses as master of 200 Gross Register Tons (GRT) or less (read: Master of Steam or Motor Vessels not greater than 100-GRT or 200-GRT) only need thirty 8-hour days or twenty 12-hour days on a tug or towboat to meet the minimum qualifications of sea service for Mate / Pilot of Towing Vessels upon oceans, near coastal, Great Lakes and inland routes. For Western Rivers one needs only ninety 8-hour days or sixty 12-hour days. This rule-change aligns (more or less) the regulations for all mariners who don’t have towing licenses or endorsements but want to work on towing vessels, and it does it in a way that virtually guarantees abuse of the system. There are more deck officers holding 100-GRT licenses (roughly 20,000) than all of the others put together. Many thousands of them, with absolutely no requirement for any relevant experience, may now be eligible for this shortcut. The only substantive difference is that the new rule requires that these masters must have three years of service (1,080 8-hour days or 720 12-hour days) on the license to be eligible for this fast track. Service on what? That doesn’t matter anymore.

The “30 days and a TOAR” loophole has existed since 2001 for masters and mates who held licenses for steam or motor vessels over 200-GRT (read: 500-GRT, 1,600-GRT and the unlimited-tonnage licenses). It was a political “compromise” (read: cave-in) made because many of the holders of these licenses, particularly the unlimited-tonnage mariners, screeched during the towing license rule-making process that placing limits on them was unfair and that the “unlimited license is no longer unlimited.” They were correct in that regard, but failed to understand the simple fact that experience gained outside the towing industry is not and can never be considered fully equivalent, or sometimes even partially equivalent, to experience gained within the towing industry. The idea that, once having attained the status of Master Mariner, there should or could ever be any limit as to what kind of vessel they could operate was an intolerable abomination, a direct assault to their inflated egos! Regardless, there never was any proper research or reasoned debate over what would be an appropriate period of “training and observation” for someone, even a veteran mariner, who wanted to move into the towing sector but had no actual experience. It was just an arbitrary number that met the key criteria of being politically palatable at the time. It was a bad precedent to set, and has now clearly led to further trouble since it was the primary justification for using the same number of days in the new rule. To paraphrase Einstein, you can’t solve a problem with the same kind of thinking that brought that problem on in the first place. But on a practical level it had little effect: then, as now, there was relatively little cross-pollination between mariners working as deck officers aboard large ships, the vast array of oilfield service vessels, and the conventional tug-and-barge community. If there had been any substantial personnel crossover then there would have been no reason to expand the loophole again.

This new rule-change, however, has the potential to cause serious safety problems in the towing sector as a result of inexperienced and unqualified mariners being shot quickly through the TOAR sign-off procedure. Despite the reasoned objections of mariners, and the opportunity to limit it to the oilfield captains (who at least have experience with heavy work boats, rough seas, strong currents, and working in close quarters around drilling rigs and production platforms) the Coast Guard left it wide open to anyone at all. This may offend some people, but experience running charter or party fishing boats, Sea Tow vessel-assist boats, water taxis, tour boats, dinner boats, sight-seeing boats, etc. is only marginally applicable to the commercial towing industry. Or the oilfield, for that matter. Candidates coming from these sectors are, with few exceptions, should be considered as little more than green deckhands who happen to have a license and possibly some decent small craft boat-handling skills that, in any case, bear very little relation to the real job at hand. Many who have come into the towing industry thinking that they were just a hop, skip and a jump from the wheelhouse have been rudely surprised to find that they were completely incompetent even to be “just” a deckhand. What is most telling about this sad state of affairs is that the only people who think this is a good idea are people who have never run a tug and have no skin in the game. When you face personal physical peril your views are usually different from those who don’t.

And who is supposed to prevent the inevitable abuse of this newly expanded loophole? The very same Coast Guard-certified Towing Vessel Designated Examiners that specifically warned the Coast Guard that this was a bad move, and were then completely ignored. Nice! But the comments from the D.E.’s are there for all the world to see on federal docket number USCG-2006-26202, so it’s not like the Coast Guard somehow didn’t get the word about what is likely to happen. It must be nice to live in a fool’s paradise. Meanwhile, the company responsible for the T/V Mel Oliver-M/V Tintomara collision in New Orleans had little regard for the regulations, and no real reason to fear that the regulators would ever be on their case about it. They were repeat offenders, and what’s going on now is just a post-accident investigation that will uncover nothing that everyone didn’t already know. Bad regulatory policy like this will only serve to encourage the other shady operators even further, putting the substantial majority of companies (who want to do the right thing) at a competitive disadvantage. And the beat goes on…..

Advertisements

Responses

  1. […] Master of Towing Vessels Association Forum has “The 30-Day Wonder“. […]

  2. […] mariners (including several Towing Vessel Designated Examiners) about their expansion of the 30-Day Wonder licensing loophole. Then they really showed all licensed mariners their ass (including some of […]

  3. I HELD A MASTER OF STEAM OR MOTOR VESSEL LICENSE BUT DID NOT MAKE GRANDFATHER TIME . SO I HAD TO GO BACK TO SCHOOL AND DO APPRENTICE PROGRAM. THEN WORK UNDER A MASTER FOR 260 12 HR. DAYS. THEN UPGRADE TO MATE OF TOWING .BUT I DID EXTRA 260 DAYS TO GET MORE EXPERINCE AS A APPRENTICE FIRST THEN GOT MY MATE (PILOT )OF TOWING. THEN THEY PASS 30 DAY WONDER NOT FAIR TO ME.

  4. ALSO WHEN THEY PASS LAW TO GET TOWING ENDOSRMENT. IWENT BACK DOWN TO MATE & DECKHAND FOR 1265 12 HR. DAYS BEFORE I WENT BACK TO SCHOOL FOR APPRINTICE PROGRAM. THEN I DID THE 520 DAYS AS A APRENTICE THEN GOT MY MATE ( PILOT ) OF TOWING . THEN THEY PASS 30 DAY WONDER NOT FAIR TO ME.

  5. Not fair to you, not fair to a lot of other people, and, most importantly, not consistent with the logic behind having towing-specific licenses in the first place. It’s just bad policy and it needs to be gotten rid of before we have another Amtrak Sunset Limited-like “accident” that could have been avoided.

  6. […] Call it short sea shipping. Call it container-on-barge (COB) service. Call it the Marine Highway or whatever you will…..Moran Towing’s Cape Cod runs across the Upper Bay with the barge New Jersey on a morning Port Newark-Red Hook shuttle run. This photo also serves to clearly illustrate why having a corps of well-trained, knowledgeable and experienced career deckhands in the towing industry is a must, not an option. Who the hell do you think is serving as this captain’s eyes for the 180-degree arc of non-visibility to starboard? Yet another good reason to do away with the 30-day Wonder! […]

  7. […] our domestic system lies in the fact that this line of short-cut logic, which smells a lot like the 30-Day Wonder (the biggest, baddest regulatory turd laid in a long time), is likely to be applied throughout our […]

  8. […] levels. This absolutely cannot be left up to the Coast Guard, the TSAC and AWO, they of the 30-Day Wonder […]

  9. […] A calm demeanor is mandatory. As for ability and experience? Well, lets just say that no 30-Day Wonders need […]

  10. […] at least hope) in earning the endorsement. Maybe Doug Pine can fill in that blank. Be realistic, the 30 day wonder is a hotly debated issue and I for one would not see any way that the TOAR can be completed in such […]

  11. […] observations, opinions and concerns of those affected by their decisions. Need modern examples? The 30-Day Wonder rulemaking is a good one, and surely you haven’t forgotten the way they totally blew us off […]

  12. […] onto their “credential” without really putting in the time to learn (a.k.a. the 30-Day Wonders), and the companies champing at the bit to hire them because of a mostly self-induced mariner […]

  13. […] by the ill-conceived 30-Day Wonder fiasco of 2008-9, which was formally endorsed by TSAC, we asked that question again and again, […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: